Looking at earlier runs, e.g. :
https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-pr-jdk9-scala2.12/2384/console

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

* What went wrong:
Could not determine java version from '9.0.1'.


This was the first build with 'out of range of int' exception:


https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-pr-jdk9-scala2.12/2389/console


However, I haven't found the commit which was at the tip of repo at that time.


On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Noticed that as well, could we track down to which git commit / version
> upgrade caused the issue?
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I took a look at recent runs under https://builds.apache.
> > org/job/kafka-pr-jdk9-scala2.12
> >
> > All the recent runs failed with:
> >
> > Could not update commit status of the Pull Request on GitHub.
> > org.kohsuke.github.HttpException: Server returned HTTP response code:
> > 201, message: 'Created' for URL:
> > https://api.github.com/repos/apache/kafka/statuses/
> > 3d96c6f5b2edd3c1dbea11dab003c4ac78ee141a
> >         at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.parse(Requester.java:633)
> >         at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.parse(Requester.java:594)
> >         at org.kohsuke.github.Requester._to(Requester.java:272)
> >         at org.kohsuke.github.Requester.to(Requester.java:234)
> >         at org.kohsuke.github.GHRepository.createCommitStatus(
> > GHRepository.java:1071)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Caused by: com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException:
> > Numeric value (4298492118) out of range of int
> >  at [Source: {"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/apache/kafka/statuses/
> > 3d96c6f5b2edd3c1dbea11dab003c4ac78ee141a","id":4298492118,"
> > state":"pending","description":"Build
> > started sha1 is
> > merged.","target_url":"https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-
> > pr-jdk9-scala2.12/2397/","context":"JDK
> > 9 and Scala 2.12",
> >
> >
> > Should we upgrade the version for jackson ?
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to