Since we already have three binding +1s for this KIP, I'm closing this thread as accepted and updating the KIP wiki accordingly.
Guozhang On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 for the KIP and Rename > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 5:51 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for the KIP and +1 on renaming "range" to "fetchAll" > > > > Thanks, > > Bill > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > BTW, Xavier has an argument to rename "range" as it does not take a key > > or > > > key range at all. I'd propose we rename this function to "fetchAll". > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 at 16:46 Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Richard Yu < > > > yohan.richard...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to propose KIP-205 for the addition of new API. It is > about > > > > adding > > > > > > methods similar to those found in ReadOnlyKeyValueStore to the > > > > > > ReadOnlyWindowStore class. As it appears the discussion has > > reached a > > > > > > conclusion, I would like to start the voting process. > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > > 205%3A+Add+all%28%29+and+range%28%29+API+to+ReadOnlyWindowStore > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your patience! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > -- -- Guozhang
