Hi Matthias, Just clarifying a meta question along side with my vote: we still need to understand the overhead of the `To` objects during run time to determine whether we would use it in the final proposal or using overloading functions. Right?
Guozhang On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:31 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the KIP, +1 for me. >> >> -Bill >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Matthias, +1 >> > >> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 02:42 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > -------- Original message --------From: "Matthias J. Sax" < >> > > matth...@confluent.io> Date: 2/8/18 6:05 PM (GMT-08:00) To: >> > > dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] KIP-251: Allow timestamp >> > > manipulation in Processor API >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I want to start the vote for KIP-251: >> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >> > 251%3A+Allow+timestamp+manipulation+in+Processor+API >> > > >> > > >> > > -Matthias >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > -- Guozhang > -- -- Guozhang
