Thanks Guozhang. I'm good with the way the documentation is now.
Is there any other procedure to follow to get "logging" and
"mirrormaker" added as components or can we just request a JIRA admin to
do that on this list?
-Ray
On 7/23/18 4:56 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
I've just updated the web docs on http://kafka.apache.org/contributing
accordingly.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:30 PM, khaireddine Rezgui <
khaireddine...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good job Ray for the wiki, it's clear enough.
Le 23 juil. 2018 10:17 PM, "Ray Chiang" <rchi...@apache.org> a écrit :
Okay, I've created a wiki page Reporting Issues in Apache Kafka
<
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/
Reporting+Issues+in+Apache+Kafka>.
I'd appreciate any feedback. If this is good enough, I can file a JIRA
to change the link under "Bugs" in the "Project information" page.
-Ray
On 7/23/18 11:28 AM, Ray Chiang wrote:
Good point. I'll look into adding some JIRA guidelines to the
documentation/wiki.
-Ray
On 7/22/18 10:23 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
Hello Ray,
Thanks for brining this up. I'm generally +1 on the first two, while for
the last category, personally I felt leaving them as part of `tools` is
fine, but I'm also open for other opinions.
A more general question though, is that today we do not have any
guidelines
to ask JIRA reporters to set the right component, i.e. it is purely
best-effort, and we cannot disallow reporters to add any new component
names. And so far the project does not really have a tradition to manage
JIRA reports per-component, as the goal is to not "separate" the project
into silos but recommending everyone to get hands on every aspect of the
project.
Guozhang
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Ray Chiang <rchi...@apache.org> wrote:
I've been doing a little bit of component cleanup in JIRA. What do
people
think of adding
one or more of the following components?
- logging: For any consumer/producer/broker logging (i.e. log4j). This
should help disambiguate from the "log" component (i.e. Kafka
messages).
- mirrormaker: There are enough requests specific to MirrorMaker
that it
could be put into its own component.
- scripts: I'm a little more ambivalent about this one, but any of the
bin/*.sh script fixes could belong in their own category. I'm not
sure if
other people feel strongly for how the "tools" component should be used
w.r.t. the run scripts.
Any thoughts?
-Ray
