Guozhang: I agree. Probably note this on your KIP.
Thanks On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:08 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Ted, > > I think dynamic configuration itself would worth an independent KIP, if you > meant to allow users changing the config on-the-fly while not bouncing the > instance. > > Guozhang > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Guozhang: > > > > Do you plan to support dynamic config for the new config entry ? > > > > Cheers > > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:00 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I would like to kick off a discussion on the following KIP, to allow > > users > > > control when a task can be processed based on its buffered records, and > > how > > > the stream time of a task be advanced. > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 353%3A+Improve+Kafka+Streams+Timestamp+Synchronization > > > > > > This is related to one of the root causes of out-of-ordering data in > > Kafka > > > Streams. Any thoughts / comments on this topic is more than welcomed. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
