Since there are questions I changed the heading from VOTE to DISCUSS
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 9:09 PM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote:
>
> s it worth spelling out explicitly what the behavior is when two topics
> have the same priority? I'm a bit fuzzy on how we choose what topics to
> consume from right now, if I'm being honest, so it could be useful to
> outline the current behavior in the background and to spell out how that
> would change (or if it would change) when two topics are given the same
> priority.
I added an additional note in the KIP’s Compatibility section to clarify that
current behavior would not change in order to preserve backwards compatibility.
> Also, how does this play with max.poll.records? Does the consumer read from
> all the topics in priority order until we've hit the number of records or
> the poll timeout? Or does it immediately return the high priority records
> without pulling low priority records?
My own interpretation would be to read from all the topics in priority order as
the consumer is subscribed to multiple topics.
--
Nick
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:39 PM <n...@afshartous.com
> <mailto:n...@afshartous.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Calling for a vote on KIP-349
>>
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-349%3A+Priorities+for+Source+Topics
>>
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-349%3A+Priorities+for+Source+Topics>
>> <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-349:+Priorities+for+Source+Topics
>>
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-349:+Priorities+for+Source+Topics>
>>
