+1 from myself.

Thanks for everyone for the feedbacks / votes. I'm closing this voting
thread with 3 binding votes (Damian, Matthias, Guozhang) and 3 non-binding
votes (John, Bill, Boyang).


Guozhang


On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:42 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Matthias,
>
> I added here since in the original KIP-345 this API was brought up once
> for the similar purpose. I agree this may cause more confusions than
> clarifications so I'll remove this.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 6:30 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the KIP.
>>
>> One side comment about rejected alternatives. I would remove the
>> sentence, because `StreamsMetadata` is part of IQ feature and not
>> related at all to this change -- thus, it does not seem to be a valid
>> alternative.
>>
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 1/11/19 5:47 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>> > Thanks for the KIP Guozhang,
>> >
>> > +1 for me.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:10 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 05:09, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Guozhang,
>> >>>
>> >>> It sounds reasonable to me. I'm +1 (nonbinding).
>> >>>
>> >>> -John
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:51 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hello folks,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'd like to start a voting process for the following KIP:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-414%3A+Expose+Embedded+ClientIds+in+Kafka+Streams
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It is a pretty straight-forward and small augment to Stream's public
>> >>>> ThreadMetadata interface, as an outcome of the discussion on KIP-345.
>> >>> Hence
>> >>>> I think we can skip the DISCUSS thread and move on to voting
>> directly.
>> >> If
>> >>>> people have any questions about the context of KIP-414 or KIP-345,
>> >> please
>> >>>> feel free to read these two wiki pages and let me know.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- Guozhang
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to