Thanks for the KIP Sophie. Overall LGTM.

One typo: "that have not yet that their iterator closed"

I also added the KIP to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Streams


-Matthias

On 2/14/19 3:29 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Made another pass over the KIP page, lgtm!
> 
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 3:05 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> 
>> Cleaned up the KIP, please take another look and if all seems good will
>> call for a vote since there seem to be no strong opinions against.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:45 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sophie,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the KIP write-up, I made a pass over the wiki and the PR as
>>> well, here's some comments:
>>>
>>> 1. the proposed API seems to be inconsistent from the PR, should it be:
>>>
>>> public static WindowBytesStoreSupplier inMemoryWindowStore(final String
>>> name,
>>>
>>>                            final Duration retentionPeriod,
>>>
>>>                            final Duration windowSize,
>>> +
>>>                            final boolean retainDuplicates) throws
>>> IllegalArgumentException ...
>>> -
>>>                             final Duration gracePeriod
>>>
>>> 2. As Boyang mentioned, we usually do not need to elaborate on the
>> internal
>>> implementation in the KIP, unless it has some user-facing implications.
>> As
>>> for this specific KIP, I think it make more sense to talk about what
>> memory
>>> footprint users would expect to have with the implementation: should they
>>> be expecting exact number of bytes used for key-value pairs only, or
>> should
>>> they expect some additional memory used for maintaining the window data
>>> structures.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Guozhang
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 4:21 AM Dongjin Lee <dong...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the KIP, Sophie. I added your KIP into the 'Under
>> Discussion'
>>>> section here
>>>> <
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
>>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> I am +1 for this proposal for reaching parity between key-value store
>> and
>>>> windowed store.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dongjin
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 1:41 PM Boyang Chen <bche...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Sophie for proposing this new feature! In-memory window store
>> is
>>>>> very useful in long term. One meta comment is that we don't need to
>>>> include
>>>>> implementation details in the public interface section, and those
>>>>> validation steps are pretty trivial.
>>>>>
>>>>> Boyang
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 9:56 AM
>>>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] KIP-428: Add in-memory window store
>>>>>
>>>>> Streams currently only has support for a RocksDB window store, but
>>> users
>>>>> have been requesting an in-memory version. This KIP introduces a
>> design
>>>> for
>>>>> an in-memory window store implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-428%3A+Add+in-memory+window+store
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Dongjin Lee*
>>>>
>>>> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
>>>> *github:  <http://goog_969573159/>github.com/dongjinleekr
>>>> <https://github.com/dongjinleekr>linkedin:
>>> kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
>>>> <https://kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr>speakerdeck:
>>>> speakerdeck.com/dongjin
>>>> <https://speakerdeck.com/dongjin>*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Guozhang
>>>
>>
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to