The voting thread seems to be referring to the wrong KIP number. It should be KIP-442 instead of KIP-422.
Thanks, Jun On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:03 PM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > Thanks all. The KIP-442 vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Guozhang, > Bill, and Damian) and one non-binding vote (me) in favor and none against. > > I'll update the KIP page. > > -John > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:29 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:38, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > Ah, good point, Guozhang. I'll remove that mention from the KIP. > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:30 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for me, > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:13 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > > > > > Though note that we cannot make such changes in older versions > since > > > even > > > > > if we release new versions out of those branches they are > considered > > > > > bug-fix only and hence should not have any interface impacting > > changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:55 PM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the KIP is so small, I'm going to optimistically start the > > vote > > > > for > > > > > > KIP-422 to remove our "max int" default max.poll.interval.ms in > > > > Streams > > > > > > and > > > > > > fall back to the Consumer default of five minutes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-442%3A+Return+to+default+max+poll+interval+in+Streams > > > > > > > > > > > > Permalink: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/1COGBg > > > > > > > > > > > > See also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6399 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any objections and wish to return > to > > > the > > > > > > discussion phase! > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
