+1 (binding)

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:44 PM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:50 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP Sophie.
> >
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:51 PM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Sophie, I reviewed the KIP, and I agree this is the best /
> > > only-practical approach.
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:23 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/6/19 6:28 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to call for a vote on a minor KIP that adds a close()
> method
> > > to
> > > > > the RocksDBConfigSetter interface of Streams.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-453%3A+Add+close%28%29+method+to+RocksDBConfigSetter
> > > > >
> > > > > This is important for users who have created RocksOBjects in
> > > > > RocksDBConfigSetter#setConfig to avoid leaking off-heap memory
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > Sophie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to