+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:12 PM Andrew Schofield <andrew_schofi...@live.com>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Andrew
>
> On 06/06/2019, 15:15, "Ryanne Dolan" <ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     +1 (non-binding)
>
>     Thanks
>     Ryanne
>
>     On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, 9:31 PM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com>
>     wrote:
>
>     > Thanks Viktor, proposed metrics are really useful to monitor
> replication
>     > status on brokers.
>     >
>     > +1 (non-binding)
>     >
>     > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:05 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>     >
>     > > +1 (binding)
>     > >
>     > > best,
>     > > Colin
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, at 03:38, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
>     > > > Hi Folks,
>     > > >
>     > > > This vote sunk a bit, I'd like to draw some attention to this
> again in
>     > > the
>     > > > hope I get some feedback or votes.
>     > > >
>     > > > Thanks,
>     > > > Viktor
>     > > >
>     > > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:28 PM Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote:
>     > > >
>     > > > > Thanks for the kip. LGTM +1.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > -Harsha
>     > > > >
>     > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
>     > > > > > Hi Jason,
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > I too agree this is more of a problem in older versions and
>     > > therefore we
>     > > > > > could backport it. Were you thinking of any specific
> versions? I
>     > > guess
>     > > > > the
>     > > > > > 2.x and 1.x versions are definitely targets here but I was
> thinking
>     > > that
>     > > > > we
>     > > > > > might not want to further.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Viktor
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:55 AM Stanislav Kozlovski <
>     > > > > stanis...@confluent.io>
>     > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > > Thanks for the work done, Viktor! +1 (non-binding)
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > I strongly agree with Jason that this monitoring-focused
> KIP is
>     > > worth
>     > > > > > > porting back to older versions. I am sure users will find
> it very
>     > > > > useful
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > Best,
>     > > > > > > Stanislav
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 9:38 PM Jason Gustafson <
>     > > ja...@confluent.io>
>     > > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > Thanks, that works for me. +1
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > By the way, we don't normally port KIPs to older
> releases, but
>     > I
>     > > > > wonder
>     > > > > > > if
>     > > > > > > > it's worth making an exception here. From recent
> experience, it
>     > > > > tends to
>     > > > > > > be
>     > > > > > > > the older versions that are more prone to fetcher
> failures.
>     > > Thoughts?
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > -Jason
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:18 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
>     > > > > > > > viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
>     > > > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > Let me have a second thought, I'll just add the
> clientId
>     > > instead to
>     > > > > > > > follow
>     > > > > > > > > the convention, so it'll change DeadFetcherThreadCount
> but
>     > > with the
>     > > > > > > > > clientId tag.
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:29 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
>     > > > > > > > > viktorsomo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > > Hi Jason,
>     > > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > > Yea I think it could make sense. In this case I would
>     > rename
>     > > the
>     > > > > > > > > > DeadFetcherThreadCount to
> DeadReplicaFetcherThreadCount and
>     > > > > introduce
>     > > > > > > > the
>     > > > > > > > > > metric you're referring to as
> DeadLogDirFetcherThreadCount.
>     > > > > > > > > > I'll update the KIP to reflect this.
>     > > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > > Viktor
>     > > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 8:07 PM Jason Gustafson <
>     > > > > ja...@confluent.io>
>     > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > >> Hi Viktor,
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> This looks good. Just one question I had is whether
> we may
>     > > as
>     > > > > well
>     > > > > > > > cover
>     > > > > > > > > >> the log dir fetchers as well.
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
>     > > > > > > > > >> Jason
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:46 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
> <
>     > > > > > > > > >> viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
>     > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Folks,
>     > > > > > > > > >> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > This thread sunk a bit but I'd like to bump it
> hoping to
>     > > get
>     > > > > some
>     > > > > > > > > >> feedback
>     > > > > > > > > >> > and/or votes.
>     > > > > > > > > >> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > Viktor
>     > > > > > > > > >> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:47 PM Viktor
> Somogyi-Vass <
>     > > > > > > > > >> > viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > wrote:
>     > > > > > > > > >> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > Sorry, the end of the message cut off.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > So I tried to be consistent with the convention
> in
>     > > > > LogManager,
>     > > > > > > > hence
>     > > > > > > > > >> the
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > hyphens and in AbstractFetcherManager, hence
> the camel
>     > > > > case. It
>     > > > > > > > > would
>     > > > > > > > > >> be
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > nice though to decide with one convention
> across the
>     > > whole
>     > > > > > > > project,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > however
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > it requires a major refactor (especially for the
>     > > components
>     > > > > that
>     > > > > > > > > >> leverage
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > metrics for monitoring).
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > Thanks,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > Viktor
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:44 PM Viktor
> Somogyi-Vass <
>     > > > > > > > > >> > > viktorsomo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> Hi Dhruvil,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks for the feedback and the vote. I fixed
> the
>     > typo
>     > > in
>     > > > > the
>     > > > > > > > KIP.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> The naming is interesting though.
> Unfortunately kafka
>     > > > > overall
>     > > > > > > is
>     > > > > > > > > not
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> consistent in metric naming but at least I
> tried to
>     > be
>     > > > > > > consistent
>     > > > > > > > > >> among
>     > > > > > > > > >> > the
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> other metrics used in LogManager
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:32 PM Dhruvil Shah <
>     > > > > > > > dhru...@confluent.io
>     > > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >> wrote:
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks for the KIP, Viktor! This is a useful
>     > > addition. +1
>     > > > > > > > overall.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Minor nits:
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > I propose to add three gauge:
>     > DeadFetcherThreadCount
>     > > > > for the
>     > > > > > > > > >> fetcher
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> threads, log-cleaner-dead-thread-count for
> the log
>     > > > > cleaner.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> I think you meant two instead of three.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Also, would it make sense to name these
> metrics
>     > > > > consistency,
>     > > > > > > > > >> something
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> like
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> `log-cleaner-dead-thread-count` and
>     > > > > > > > > >> > `replica-fetcher-dead-thread-count`?
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Dhruvil
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:27 AM Viktor
>     > Somogyi-Vass <
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> viktorsomo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > Hi All,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-434.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > This basically would add a metrics to count
> dead
>     > > > > threads in
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > ReplicaFetcherManager and LogCleaner to
> allow
>     > > monitoring
>     > > > > > > > systems
>     > > > > > > > > >> to
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> alert
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > based on this.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > The KIP link:
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> >
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FKAFKA%2FKIP-434%253A%2BAdd%2BReplica%2BFetcher%2Band%2BLog%2BCleaner%2BCount%2BMetrics&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfba5c88ee8c34b6728da08d6ea896b4c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636954273269426914&amp;sdata=ao77pEeuTtwV%2FVUo6Z3k0p9FalyLaEGD%2BJdcx6aoS%2FQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > The
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > PR:
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fkafka%2Fpull%2F6514&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfba5c88ee8c34b6728da08d6ea896b4c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636954273269426914&amp;sdata=4W7Gb4SreXQPxP1j6bt53mbYUC6cKnFJQWOv3aDMtdY%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > I'd be happy to receive any votes or
> additional
>     > > > > > > > feedback/reviews
>     > > > > > > > > >> too.
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > Thanks,
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > Viktor
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>> >
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>>
>     > > > > > > > > >> > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >> >
>     > > > > > > > > >>
>     > > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > --
>     > > > > > > Best,
>     > > > > > > Stanislav
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to