+1 (non-binding) I also verifies signatures, build from source and tested the Quickstart successfully on the built binary.
BTW, I don't see a link to documentation for 2.3. Is there a reason? Thanks, --Vahid On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 6:38 PM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Verified signatures, built from sources, ran quickstart on binary and > checked out the passing jenkins build on the branch. > > Gwen > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:58 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Good news: I have run a junit test build for RC2, and it passed. Check > out https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-2.3-jdk8/51/ > > > > Also, the vote will go until Saturday, June 15th (sorry for the typo > earlier in the vote end time). > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019, at 15:55, Colin McCabe wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We discovered some problems with the first release candidate (RC1) of > > > 2.3.0. Specifically, KAFKA-8484 and KAFKA-8500. I have created a new > > > release candidate that includes fixes for these issues. > > > > > > Check out the release notes for the 2.3.0 release here: > > > https://home.apache.org/~cmccabe/kafka-2.3.0-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > > > > > The vote will go until Friday, June 7th, or until we create another R > > > > > > * Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release can > > > be found here: > > > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS > > > > > > * The release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary) are here: > > > https://home.apache.org/~cmccabe/kafka-2.3.0-rc2/ > > > > > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/ > > > > > > * Javadoc: > > > https://home.apache.org/~cmccabe/kafka-2.3.0-rc2/javadoc/ > > > > > > * The tag to be voted upon (off the 2.3 branch) is the 2.3.0 tag: > > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/2.3.0-rc2 > > > > > > best, > > > Colin > > > > > > > -- > Gwen Shapira > Product Manager | Confluent > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > Follow us: Twitter | blog > -- Thanks! --Vahid
