Hello, A few requests have been sent already. Could this please be reviewed ? Our business implementation is holding due to this change.
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 13:33, M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6771 > > Could this be reviewed please ? > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 11:35, M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6771 >> >> Bouncing both users and dev to get some activity going. We are waiting >> for a while to get this KIP pr merged. >> >> Could someone please review? >> >> Thanks, >> >> On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 at 08:59, M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6771 >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Could the above PR can be reviewed? This has been waiting for a long >>> time. >>> >>> Just to mention, the package name should have "internal". Round-robin >>> partitioning should have been supported without/without a key from the >>> beginning. It provides user a guaranteed round-robin partitioning without >>> having to regard for key values (e.g. null/not null). From our business >>> side, this is a Kafka internal logic. Hence, the placement inside >>> "internal" package. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>
