Hello folks,

I've also updated the wiki page by making the augmented
`ConsumerPartitionAssignor` out as a public API in `o.a.k.clients.consumer`
and deprecate the old `PartitionAssignor` as in
`o.a.k.clients.consumer.internals`.


Guozhang

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:30 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> It is now! Also updated the KIP to reflect that we will be adding a new
> CooperativeStickyAssignor rather than making the existing StickyAssignor
> cooperative to prevent users who already use the StickyAssignor from
> blindly upgrading and hitting potential problems during a rolling bounce
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 8:15 PM Boyang Chen <reluctanthero...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Sophie for the update. Is this also reflected on the KIP?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:28 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We would like to tack on some rebalance-related metrics as part of this
> > KIP
> > > as well. The details can be found in the sub-task JIRA:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8609
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:09 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding) from me as well.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to everyone who have voted! I'm closing this vote thread with
> a
> > > > tally:
> > > >
> > > > binding +1: 3 (Guozhang, Harsha, Matthias)
> > > >
> > > > non-binding +1: 2 (Boyang, Liquan)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Guozhang
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:22 PM Matthias J. Sax <
> matth...@confluent.io
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/22/19 7:37 PM, Harsha wrote:
> > > > > > +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP looking forward for this to be
> > > > avaiable
> > > > > in consumers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Harsha
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019, at 12:24 AM, Liquan Pei wrote:
> > > > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:34 PM Boyang Chen <
> bche...@outlook.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Thank you Guozhang for all the hard work.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> ________________________________
> > > > > >>> From: Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 1:32 AM
> > > > > >>> To: dev
> > > > > >>> Subject: [VOTE] KIP-429: Kafka Consumer Incremental Rebalance
> > > > Protocol
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hello folks,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I'd like to start the voting for KIP-429 now, details can be
> > found
> > > > > here:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-429%3A+Kafka+Consumer+Incremental+Rebalance+Protocol#KIP-429:KafkaConsumerIncrementalRebalanceProtocol-RebalanceCallbackErrorHandling
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> And the on-going PRs available for review:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Part I: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6528
> > > > > >>> Part II: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6778
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > > >>> -- Guozhang
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Liquan Pei
> > > > > >> Software Engineer, Confluent Inc
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -- Guozhang
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to