Thers's a big one if you look at the main apache web site, but not sure about a vectorized one
On Wednesday, October 27, 2010, Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok., we have a snapshot on black background: > http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/1469/karaf4.jpg > > Anyway does anyone have access to feather in vector form? > > Regards, > Lukasz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Heinemann [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lars > Heinemann > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Logo proposal > > The feather is much too big in comparison with the text in #2 and #11. > And I wouldn't stick the feather somewhere. And sticking the feather into > the > top of the Karaf/bottle makes it look like an inkwell. > > Try to shrink the feather and as suggested by David Jencks let it start over > the > diagonal line of the K of Karaf. > > > Best regards, > Lars > > -------------------------------------- > > Lars Heinemann > FuseSource > Email: [email protected] > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: lhein77 > > > > Am 27.10.2010 um 11:19 schrieb Łukasz Dywicki: > >> Hi, >> Take a look: http://tinyurl.com/karaf-logoff >> >> Regards, >> Lukasz >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 9:30 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Logo proposal >> >> I think the feather would stay in color, but the text + picture in >> black allows a variation in white (if put on a dark background). >> >> 2010/10/26 David Jencks <[email protected]>: >>> re 44: The text looks squished or like 4:3 television stretched to 16:9. >> I think the text needs to be about 30% taller and the feather shrunk so > it >> starts over the diagonal line of the K. I'm not sure what people mean > about >> white on black -- would the feather remain in color? Seeing it would be >> great. >>> >>> With the current choices I favor 45. If 44 can be better proportioned I >> think I would prefer 44. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> >>>> I've created a wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/KARAF/logo.html >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:33, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I think we need to reduce the number of options a bit and then have a >>>>> vote / poll (I certainly don't want to push the feather if i'm the >>>>> only one liking it). >>>>> >>>>> 2010/10/26 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]>: >>>>>> What is decision - do we use logo with feather? We can create the > Karaf >> logo in two variants: black on white and white on black. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Lukasz >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 11:11 AM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: Logo proposal >>>>>> >>>>>> See http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ >>>>>> There's no difference between the feather and any project specific >>>>>> logo, so I don't think it's a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:57, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> I wonder if there is any copyright issues with the apache feather. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For example if you want to use the logo on a -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
