+1 to intuitive schema, -1 to jumping versions. I don't think a release series of karaf 3.0.1, 3.0.3, 3.0.5 looks right, it would appear better to me as 3.0.0, 3.0.1, and finally 3.0.2.
Jamie On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > Also +1 from me to a more initutive schema (but without jumping versions if > possible :), IMHO snapshots in production environments shouldn't be used > anyway > and in testing environment you could completely replace the snapshots with the > released version without any problems...) > > kind regards, > andreas > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:43:51AM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >> +1 from me for a more intuitive scheme :) >> >> 2011/2/7 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: >> > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 09:46, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> tbh I don't like the approach to skip versions. IMHO a higher version >> >> number >> >> should present more stability and you simply assume that a X.X.1 >> >> is more stable than a X.X.0 release and not that the X.X.1 release >> >> actually is >> >> the X.X.0 release... Sry, but this sounds wrong somehow :) >> > >> > I agree it's not an intuitive scheme. So we just have to decide if >> > the benefits outnumbers the drawbacks or not. >> > I don't have any problems if we as a team decide to go back to the >> > plain and simple versioning scheme. >> > >> >> >> >> kind regards, >> >> andreas >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:11:42PM +1300, Mark Derricutt wrote: >> >>> We've gotten into the habit of NEVER having .0 releases EVER. >> >>> >> >>> i.e. we always start with 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT, or 1.3.4.1-SNAPSHOT. This >> >>> way a >> >>> range of [2.0,3.0) works nicely. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven >> >>> Wilson, >> >>> Porcupine Tree >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > In OSGi, 2.2-SNAPSHOT > 2.2.0, so it can cause artifacts to be badly >> >>> > wired against the snapshot instead of the release. So you can't >> >>> > really deploy snapshots and releases at the same time. >> >>> > On the other hand, it you build an artifact that import >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cheers, >> > Guillaume Nodet >> > ------------------------ >> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> > ------------------------ >> > Open Source SOA >> > http://fusesource.com >> > >
