In which particular area would we use that for features ?

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> Correct Guillaume.
>
> I've answered without checking the code.
>
> Anyway, we should:
> 1/ add a class in utils bundle to manipulate name/version
> 2/ implement in the core of features, bundles, etc the support of this new
> nomenclature
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/10/2011 08:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> I don't think the doExecute() methods has to be changed as it already
>> uses a List<Bundle>  as an argument.
>> Changing the ids parameter of BundlesCommand to a List<String>  would
>> be fine imho and we could thus do smarter things such as using bundle
>> names and bundle ids ranges as you suggested.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> we have two enhancement planned around that:
>>> - using of name and patterns. In place of using bundle id, we would like
>>> to
>>> give the possibility to start/stop bundle using name (osgi:start mybundle
>>> and osgi:start mybundle/version). More over, we plan to support regex on
>>> the
>>> name (osgi:start myb* and osgi:start myb*/version). The same behavior is
>>> planned for features.
>>> - I think it's a good idea to start a group of bundles using a id range.
>>> The
>>> code of the start/stop command (doExecute() method) should be enhanced,
>>> but
>>> it's not a big deal.
>>>
>>> Could you raise a Jira, I will do it for 3.0.0 release ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 02/10/2011 02:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We had someone ask if the bundle start/stop etc commands could accept a
>>>> version range such as
>>>>
>>>> 31-94
>>>>
>>>> rather than an explicit list of bundle ids. IIUC this would involve
>>>> changing how BundlesCommand @Argument ids is configured.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone point me to how this is done?
>>>>
>>>> If the code changes needed for this are reasonably simple does this seem
>>>> like it has a place in karaf?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to