Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move this along to 2.1.5?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've > just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to > give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a > release candidate build. > > In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc. > > J > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ioannis Canellos <ioca...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My +1 for the 2.1.4 >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck >> <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote: >> >>> +1 for a 2.1.4 release >>> >>> 2011/2/11 <j...@nanthrax.net>: >>> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release. >>> > >>> > I do my best to do it shortly. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Regards >>> > JB >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: "Jamie G." <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> >>> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26 >>> > To: <dev@karaf.apache.org> >>> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org >>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status >>> > >>> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on >>> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it >>> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :) >>> > >>> > J >>> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've >>> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the >>> list >>> >> --> +1 for going ahead >>> >> >>> >> kind regards, >>> >> andreas >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0 >>> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time >>> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4. >>> >>> >>> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch, >>> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no >>> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Jamie >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Ioannis Canellos* >> http://iocanel.blogspot.com >> >> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com> >> >