Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move
this along to 2.1.5?

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. <jamie.goody...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
> just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
> give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a
> release candidate build.
>
> In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc.
>
> J
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ioannis Canellos <ioca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My +1 for the 2.1.4
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck 
>> <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>>>
>>> 2011/2/11  <j...@nanthrax.net>:
>>> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>>> >
>>> > I do my best to do it shortly.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Regards
>>> > JB
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: "Jamie G." <jamie.goody...@gmail.com>
>>> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
>>> > To: <dev@karaf.apache.org>
>>> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
>>> >
>>> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
>>> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
>>> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
>>> >
>>> > J
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
>>> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the
>>> list
>>> >> --> +1 for going ahead
>>> >>
>>> >> kind regards,
>>> >> andreas
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>>> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>>> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>>> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>>> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Jamie
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>>
>> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
>>
>

Reply via email to