AFAIR, I've already done KARAF-325.
Regards
JB
On 03/28/2011 11:19 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
+1 for the "name" way, regarding KARAF-325, doesn't that work already?
2011/3/28 Charles Moulliard<[email protected]>:
+1 to provide a "name" as identifier of a feature. That will help
administrator when they do a full reinstall of features to use this
name as a key within their install/reinstall scripts.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Ioannis,
as you can see, of course, the user can still use id number.
For the bundle location, it's not easy because the location is quite "lost"
once the bundle is deployed (we can only work on the bundle headers).
Regards
JB
On 03/28/2011 11:05 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
I think that for issue 325 we don't need to change anything. All we need
is
to upgrade the command to work with wildchars.
For the rest issues, I feel that we need to keep the existing way of
working
(use of bundle ids) and possibly provide alternative ways with the use of
some flags.
Now regarding the flags I would prefer to the bundle location
(mvn:/groupId/arifactId/version or file:/folderA/folderB). I am not sure
how
we could use autocompletion with flags.
If we are to keep the existing way "identifying bundles" then I vote +1 on
adding it to 2.2.x, if we are to change it then it would be better to move
it 3.x.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste
Onofré<[email protected]>wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on KARAF-452, KARAF-33 and KARAF-325.
These three jira are related the same topic: identification of bundles
and
features.
I propose the following convention to identify a bundles or features.
The identifier could be:
- a id (long) (as it is currently)
- a name (for instance bundle_A), the name could contain regexp (for
instance bundle_*)
- a name and a version (for instance bundle_A/1.0.0), the name and
version
could contain regexp (for instance bundle_*/1.0.0 or bundle_A/1*)
- a range of id (for instance 1-4 7-9 will install bundles with id 1, 2,
3,
4 and 7, 8, 9)
WDYT ?
I made good progress on the trunk.
I wonder if I merge this to karaf-2.2.x branch. I think it could be
interesting to provide this in the next 2.2.2 version.
WDYT ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
