The website just requires committer status. According to this a PMC is 'preferred', as the PMCs are responsible for their projects distribution directory at Apache. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
Cheers, Jamie On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:49 PM, mikevan <[email protected]> wrote: > > jgoodyear wrote: >> >> As a reminder our release process is posted here: >> http://karaf.apache.org/index/developers/release-guide.html >> >> To my knowledge those instructions should be sufficient to allow >> anyone the ability to perform a Karaf release, the only caveat I >> believe is that they have committer status as its required to perform >> tags & uploads (not sure if PMC is required or not when it comes to >> nexus). >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Very true Mike. I've been picking up release duties as required. I >>> have no claim at all to doing them other than if/when I'm actively >>> assigned and working upon a particular release Jira task. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jamie >>> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, mikevan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I think clustering is important enough to be part of the enterprise >>>>> features. >>>>> >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> Am 04.05.2011 14:01, schrieb Ioannis Canellos: >>>>>> Guys, we are getting off topic. >>>>>> >>>>>> Even though I like Guillaume's ideas about central repository etc, it >>>>>> is >>>>>> still hypothetical since the mechanism is not implemented yet and thus >>>>>> we >>>>>> can't base our decisions on that. >>>>>> >>>>>> What we currently have is standard/enterprise features descriptor. >>>>>> What I >>>>>> am >>>>>> saying is that clustering should be part of the enterprise features >>>>>> descriptor *(and probably hosted as subproject)*. Once we implement >>>>>> the >>>>>> central repository mechanism we can move it there. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Guillaume >>>>>> Nodet<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ---- >>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>>> >>>> >>>> Subprojects sounds like a good idea on the face, but it really comes >>>> down to >>>> a management issue. Who is going to be responsible for each >>>> sub-project? >>>> Right now we have a few folks who are working on Karaf in addition to >>>> other >>>> open-source projects. IMHO, we should not have a sub-project unless we >>>> have >>>> someone willing to be responsible for it. I also don't think Jamie >>>> should >>>> be that one person for all sub-projects. However, if we can get folks >>>> to >>>> accept responsiblity for them, I think its a great idea. >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Van (aka karafman) >>>> Karaf Team (Contributor) >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899307.html >>>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >> > Hmm.. I thought PMC was required for a release, or is that just for the > site? > > ----- > Mike Van (aka karafman) > Karaf Team (Contributor) > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899495.html > Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
