I'm don't think it's a good idea because of the way blueprint proxies work. I'll to provide mire information later but I'm at the airport. Please hold on until we can discuss that further.
On Friday, July 8, 2011, Christian Schneider (JIRA) wrote: > Refactor Actions to get services injected instead of fetching them > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: KARAF-717 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-717 > Project: Karaf > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Christian Schneider > Assignee: Christian Schneider > Priority: Minor > > > Currently we use abstract classes like ObrCommandSupport and > OsgiCommandSupport to handle the bundleContext and service references. > This makes the code harder to test and mixes technical and business code. > By business I mean the stuff the class is meant to do by technical I mean > other domains like osgi services. > > So I propose to inject the services we need using blueprint so in the > Action there is only the interface to the service and a setter. > Additionally I would even skip the AbstractAction as it is not good to > store the CommandSession in a class attribute as this makes the code non > reentrant. > > I have done a sample refactoring in > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1144288 > > It shows how to change the ListCommand of the Obr to not need any abstract > support classes to handle the RepositoryAdmin service. > > This issue is a marker that we should do the refactoring and should be > split into smaller tasks when we start the refactoring. > > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ FuseSource, Integration everywhere http://fusesource.com
