yeah, +1 from my side.
2012/6/18 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: > Sounds good to me. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Working on karaf-2.3.x branch, I detected issue on the itests after >> upgrading to OSGi 4.3: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1554 >> >> As the Karaf 2.3.x itests are based on the 2.2.x ones, they are "fragile" >> and so it's not easy to update pax-runner and/or OSGi framework without >> breaking something else. >> >> That's why I propose to refactore the itests in order to use paxexam-karaf >> (from github): it will simplify the itests and we will be able to easily >> extend it. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
