+1 to that strategy. As said, just wanted it to be discussed. Kind regards, Andreas
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > sounds reasonable > > Regards, Achim > > 2012/6/18 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: >> I would prefer to stay with OSGi r4.3 for Karaf 3.0 and prepare the update >> to r5 in Karaf 4.0. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 06/18/2012 07:11 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>> >>> it seams that the osgi libs also reached central within the last days. >>> I'm curious if it's worth including them into karaf3. Otherwise I >>> think we would have wait for them till karaf 4 (which isn't a bad idea >>> either IMHO). I think we should just talk about it. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Andreas >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> FWIW, >>>> http://blog.osgi.org/2012/06/core-release-5-and-enterprise-release-5.html >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>> ------------------------ >>>> FuseSource, Integration everywhere >>>> http://fusesource.com >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin > <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project > Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
