For Karaf 3.x +1 for the alpha release
+1 for looking for interested parties. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > I'm also with JB so as a optional feature for 3.x > > and a > > +1 for the alpha release > > +1 for looking for interested parties. > > even though the Karaf space may not be the best place for those > additions I really would like to see those beeing available at least > as "showcases" > > regards, Achim > > 2012/8/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > we discussed about WebConsole during the 2nd Karaf Birthday call. > > > > I propose to include it asap on trunk to be able to include it in Karaf > > 3.0.0, or at least in 3.1.0. > > > > Regarding the vote: > > > > +1 to release an alpha immediately and include it on trunk (it could be > an > > "optional" feature, having both webconsole (old style) and new webconsole > > available) > > > > +0 for the other communities announcement. I'm agree but my concerning is > > more about timing. Before announcing and promoting WebConsole, I would > first > > release a version which allow us to perform tests on it and be sure we > are > > OK. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 08/10/2012 02:51 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > >> > >> Dear all, > >> Last year Andreas, Charles and I started working on Karaf WebConsole. > >> Since then lots of things was done - almost complete support for OSGi > >> management, switching to Wicket 1.5. Some of things still need to be > done - > >> complete Karaf modules, clean up or improve Config Admin / Events / Log > / > >> Blueprint pages. Branch for Karaf 3.0 (easy stuff). After that we > should be > >> ready to release stable version. Even now we can release early alpha to > let > >> 2.x users test webconsole and get involved in community. > >> > >> Outside core modules we have integrations with Camel / CXF and > ServiceMix. > >> These modules are not supported and was done by me as proof of > concepts. For > >> now there is no one who is interested in it. We should consider to > announce > >> existence of these modules or even Karaf WebConsole to other > communities to > >> get them involved in development. If we won't do that we may remove > these > >> modules as they will be not supported. > >> > >> Please take a vote in following two topics: > >> > >> Should WebConsole be early released: > >> +1: Yes we should release alpha immediately > >> 0: We should clean up code shortly and release > >> -1: Wait untill getting stable codebase > >> > >> Should Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules be announced to other > communities: > >> +1: Yes, we need to look for interested parties > >> -1: No, we don't need them now, remove it > >> > >> I hope that vote will be also good occassion to discuss about > WebConsole. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Lukasz > >> > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin > <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project > Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com Twitter : @cmoulliard Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
