+1

I am pretty sure we can release karaf 3.0.0 rc1 pretty soon.

Christian

On 10/11/2012 10:44 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi guys,

just an update about this discussion.

I added spring31* features in Karaf 2.3.x.

I don't want to add spring*/3.1.2.RELEASE features, as it will be used by default (for instance, if a feature uses a spring version range like [3,4), by default, spring 3.1.2.RELEASE would be installed). So, to prevent potential side effect, I have clearly identified the features with 31 in the name (spring31, spring31-jms, etc).

The issue with this approach is that, if a feature wants to use spring 3.1, it should rely on a specific name, which is not perfect.

So I wonder if it doesn't make sense to simply remove spring 3.1.x features in Karaf 2.3.0 and wait for Karaf 3.0.0 release (which includes it), or if we *really* need Spring 3.1 support quickly prepare Karaf 2.4.0 which can be exactly the same as Karaf 2.3.0 but with the upgrades to Spring 3.1 and Jetty 8 for instance.

WDYT ?

Regards
JB

On 10/10/2012 08:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi guys,

just an summarise and "close" the discussion.

Regarding the different message, the final proposal is:

- stay with Spring 3.0.x and Jetty 7.6.x in Karaf 2.3.0
- depending of the effort, include an optional spring31 feature in Karaf
2.3.0 (I'm working on it and I will give you an update)

Regarding Karaf 2.4.x, we can start a discussion thread but I don't
think it's a good idea: Karaf 3.0.0 already includes Spring 3.1.x and
Jetty 8.x, I think it makes sense to focus on this release more than an
intermediate one.

Karaf 2.3.0 should be released tonight.

Does it work for all ?

Regards
JB

On 10/08/2012 09:38 AM, j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Great, thanks a lot !

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com

----- Reply message -----
From: "Andreas Pieber" <anpie...@gmail.com>
To: <dev@karaf.apache.org>
Subject: Apache Karaf 2.3.0 very close
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 9:17 am


Hey,

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
@Andreas, could you take a look on KARAF-1878 and KARAF-1752
(assigned to
you) ? If you are busy today, I think we can postpone to 2.3.1.

I wanted to keep KARAF-1878 opened for review till tonight; I'll apply
afterwards. I'll also apply KARAF-1752 then.

Kind regards,
Andreas


Thanks all guys,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com



Reply via email to