Hi Jb, for 1) +1 In IMHO use minor number is the best choice.
for 2) +1 Regards. --Filippo 2012/12/17 Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>: > Hi JB, > > for 1) I think it's to early to give it a major number version therefore a > 0.9.0 version fits probably best. > so +1 > > for 2) everything sounds like a good plan. > +1 > > regards, Achim > > > 2012/12/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to plan some releases in the following weeks. >> >> 1/ EIK >> EIK is now ready for a first release. I will close a couple of issues >> today and review the legal stuff (especially the NOTICE and LICENSE files, >> as we "use" some Eclipse parts). >> I propose to cut off EIK 3.0.0 this week. By the way, is 3.0.0 version >> make sense for you ? My proposal would be to change to 0.9 version as it's >> the first EIK one. >> >> 2/ Karaf >> Both trunk and karaf-2.3.x have an issue with Aries Blueprint (some >> bundles stay in GracePeriod forever at startup). Dan tried a fix in Aries >> that he reverted. I'm working on it and I will probably update to Aries >> SNAPSHOTs in Karaf. I will request the help of Guillaume and Dan, both to >> help me around the fix, and to plan an Aries release as well. >> In the mean time, I will move forward on the Karaf 2.3.x pending issues. >> As soon as we have a new Aries release, we can: >> - release 2.3.1 >> - release 3.0.0.RC1 >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> > Commiter & Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
