we did, but iirc we neither come to a final conclusion nor where the future
steps fixed.

Kind regards,
Andreas


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we already discuss to "isolate" Spring, Enterprises, etc features, in
> order to release "independently" from the Karaf "distribution".
>
> Let me find the discussion thread.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 02/27/2013 08:17 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Perhaps we should have a separate subproject/repository for the enterprise
>> features. The wouldn't block Karaf releases but could be updated after a
>> new Karaf version is released (e.g. if the enterprise features need some
>> dependencies included in standard Karaf features) or after a new
>> enterprise
>> library is released. Another solution would be such a repository as a SMX
>> subproject. There is already repository for osgifying external bundles
>> (Could be there committed any osgified libraries or should they be
>> compatible with Apache license?). There could be something similar for
>> enterprise features.
>>
>> In my opinion the current Karaf enterprise features repository should
>> still
>> be part of Karaf as it is a integral part of Karaf and many other features
>> depend on them. I mean we could have a separate subproject for any other
>> 3rd party enterprise libraries which other users could use in their
>> projects.
>>
>> I don't know whether all  eterprise libraries fulfill  the rules to be
>> dependencies of Apache project. If no, It could be only a Github project.
>>
>> Regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>> On 27 February 2013 06:26, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> In general I still get a stall feeling in my stomage seeing all those
>>> enterprise features. Keeping them directly at Karaf sounds like a bad
>>> idea.
>>> We have already problems with the other enterprise features and their
>>> versions (e.g. Spring). Maybe it's slowly getting time to decide how we
>>> want to manage such external feature bundles? I add the dev list for CC
>>> to
>>> get this question explicitly to the dev community.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to