On 19 Feb 2015 10:09, "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > 2015-02-19 11:01 GMT+01:00 Fabian Lange <fabian.la...@codecentric.de>: > > > Hi Guillaume, > > > > as somebody who put stuff to lib, I discovered that karaf* magic myself. > > > > I think lib/system is more explicit. But then I would prefer if all > > jars there are added to the JVM classpath, not only karaf*. > > > > Yes, definitely, sorry to not have been more clear, but that was definitely > the idea. So instead of having special karaf* jars, it would simply load > all jars in lib/system.
lib/boot might make more sense, to avoid confusion with the existing top-level system directory > > > > Also worth noting: I have not found a nice way to include the JVM > > tools.jar (pre Java 9) onto the classpath without patching the > > karaf.sh. Not sure if this is a karaf use-case and it could be simpler > > (tools.jar is tricky and actually going away with 9) > > > > I'm sure we can find a solution, but it seems to me that there are still a > lot > of stuff that is missing or bound to change in Java 9 ... > > > > > > Fabian > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm thinking about slightly changing the way the lib folder is organised > > in > > > Karaf 4. > > > With all previous versions, the lib folder can contains jar with 2 > > > different set of jars: > > > - karaf*.jar will be loaded when the JVM is started (they are appended > > to > > > the class path of the java command) > > > - other jars are loaded by the Main class along with the osgi framework > > > jar > > > > > > The convention that jars named karaf*.jar are loaded and available to the > > > Main class (for example for jdbc lock access) is not really explicit > > enough > > > imho. > > > > > > I wonder if it would make sense to set up a separate lib/system directory > > > which would contain those karaf*.jar files (thus avoiding the need to > > > rename them). > > > We could keep the lib/ folder for jars that will be loaded by the Main > > > class, or even move them to a separate directory such as lib/app, but I'm > > > not really sure it brings anything. > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > Guillaume > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------ > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > ------------------------ > > > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > > > > > Email: gno...@redhat.com > > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >
