Valid point! Not sure log4j2 has this on its list as well. Regards, -Yogesh
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Guillaume Nodet-2 [via Karaf] < [email protected]> wrote: > The main problem I see is that log4jv2 support is still not on par. The > main problem is that the configuration does not support properties file, > so > that a bunch of things like going through configadmin using file install, > log:set commands, etc... would be broken. > > 2015-02-19 15:33 GMT+01:00 yogu13 <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4038635&i=0>>: > > > Hello Achim, > > > > Karaf supports / includes pax logging.. Pax logging has implemented the > > support for log4j2..IMO if karaf includes pax logging then it should be > > including the support for all implemented logging flavours and let user > > decide which implementation to use and not be selective. > > > > Regards, > > -Yogesh > > > > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Achim Nierbeck [via Karaf] < > > [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4038635&i=1>> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I can't remember that we decided to switch to log4j2 as service impl > for > > > the karaf logging so this is quite intentional. > > > If you rather have another logging available you'll need to change > that > > in > > > your custom distribution. > > > > > > regards, Achim > > > > > > > > > 2015-02-19 14:01 GMT+01:00 yogu13 <[hidden email] > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4038632&i=0>>: > > > > > > > JB, > > > > > > > > Looks like karaf didnt include the pax-logging-log4j2 feature as > part > > of > > > > their asslembly. As part of the feature file I only see > > > > > > > > > > > > <bundle start="true" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-api/${pax.logging.version}</bundle> > > > > > > > > <bundle start="true" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-service/${pax.logging.version}</bundle> > > > > > > > > > > > > log4j2 and pax-logging-log4j2 bundles are missing. > > > > > > > > file being referred -> [karaf.git] -> assemblies -> features -> > > > framework > > > > -> src -> main -> feature -> feature.xml > > > > > > > > Do we need to raise a JIRA for this? > > > > > > > > Let me know.. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -Yogesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038631.html > > > > Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Apache Member > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer > > & > > > Project Lead > > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > > > > > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion > > > below: > > > > > > > > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038632.html > > > To unsubscribe from Were you guys still interested in adopting Log4j2 > > for > > > your logging system?, click here > > > < > > > > > > . > > > NAML > > > < > > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038634.html > > Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038635.html > To unsubscribe from Were you guys still interested in adopting Log4j2 for > your logging system?, click here > <http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4033296&code=eW9ndTEzQGdtYWlsLmNvbXw0MDMzMjk2fC04ODQzODQxMjM=> > . > NAML > <http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Were-you-guys-still-interested-in-adopting-Log4j2-for-your-logging-system-tp4033296p4038637.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
