Hi Guillaume,
as far as I can see, you made the fix. Should this be ported to 4.0.x?

Fabian

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm not sure why KARAF-3974 is flagged as fixed for 4.0.x, I don't see any
> related commit on that branch.
> So my guess is that it has only been fixed on master (4.1), hence the
> difference you see on the sshd-core bundle.
>
> 2016-07-21 20:38 GMT+02:00 Fabian Lange <fabian.la...@codecentric.de>:
>
> > Oh, it was removed from the 4.1 version of framework.
> >
> > is it staying in 4.0.x for compatibility? Or was that an omission
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/karaf/commit/71942556ca2a7796fa6908aeec069442811d5f45
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-3974
> >
> > Fabian
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Fabian Lange <
> fabian.la...@codecentric.de
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > as you could see from my last request about jaxb (thanks for answering,
> > > still working on it) I am looking for ways to trim down karaf in
> install
> > > and memory size.
> > >
> > > I noticed that I get a bundle called sshd-core installed even when not
> > > having ssh installed.
> > >
> > > I suspect the reason for that is that it downloads the jar so the
> > ./client
> > > command can actually work.
> > >
> > > Is there any better way to bundle it? currently it will always install
> as
> > > active bundle on startup even when nobody needs it.
> > >
> > > Fabian
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fabian Lange | Performance Expert
> > > mobil: +49 (0) 160.3673393
> > >
> > > codecentric AG | Merscheider Straße 1 | 42699 Solingen | Deutschland
> > >
> > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Solingen | HRB 25917| Amtsgericht Wuppertal
> > > Vorstand: Michael Hochgürtel . Mirko Novakovic . Rainer Vehns
> > > Aufsichtsrat: Patric Fedlmeier (Vorsitzender) . Klaus Jäger . Jürgen
> > Schütz
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Red Hat, Open Source Integration
>
> Email: gno...@redhat.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to