I know. I looked at the code. That's why I was surprised when I had issues when trying it that way. It could be I'm doing something strange with CXF, but it works in a non-staged setup. If I get some cycles, perhaps I can try it again and record the error.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:11 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > Using staged features with one feature per set will have the exact same > behavior than installing the features one by one. > > Here's the BootFeaturesInstaller code: > > List<Set<String>> stagedFeatures = parseBootFeatures(features); > for (Set<String> features : stagedFeatures) { > featuresService.installFeatures(features, > EnumSet.of(FeaturesService.Option.NoFailOnFeatureNotFound)); > } > featuresService.bootDone(); > > > > 2016-11-18 17:03 GMT+01:00 James Carman <[email protected]>: > > > Yes, I've tried using staged boot, but in 3.0.x it caused some classpath > > issues with CXF. It would be great if we could just set up our features > so > > that they're just installed in the order they're defined. > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:56 AM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > You mean installing the features one by one instead of all in one go ? > > > Have you tried using > > > (myfeature1,myfeature2),(myfeature3,myfeature4) > > > so that you end up with 2 stages ? > > > Ultimately, you can use > > > (myfeature1),(myfeature2),(myfeature3),(myfeature4) > > > > > > 2016-11-18 16:44 GMT+01:00 James Carman <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Karaf 3.0.8+ now provides predictable boot feature startup order, but > > the > > > > 4.0.x line does not provide that guarantee. It apparently tries to > be > > > > smart and figure out what you need, but sometimes it just works > better > > if > > > > we can let the user control things explicitly. Is there, perhaps, a > > > > compromise here? Could we perhaps have a switch in the > > > > org.apache.karaf.features.cfg file that allows you to turn on manual > > > > control of the startup order? I'm not the only one who has > encountered > > > > this issue. There have been emails recently where other folks have > > > > observed it. Thoughts? > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------ > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > ------------------------ > > > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > > > > > Email: [email protected] > > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > Email: [email protected] > Web: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >
