On Wednesday 18 January 2017 11:03:42 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> In that case, it might be better to use the same config as previously, i.e.
> route on bundle.name instead of bundle.id.
+1
Thanks,
O.
> 2017-01-18 11:01 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
> > +1
> >
> > It will do it.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Jan 18, 2017, 01:59, at 01:59, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de>
> >
> > wrote:
> > >On Wednesday 18 January 2017 10:25:42 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > >> I just got it working with something like:
> > >>
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.type = Routing
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.name = Routing
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.type = Routes
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.pattern = \$\$\\\{ctx:bundle.id\}
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.type = Route
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.type =
> > >> RollingRandomAccessFile
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.name =
> > >
> > >Bundle-\$\\\{ctx:
> > >> bundle.id\}
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.fileName =
> > >> ${karaf.data}/log/bundle-\$\\\{ctx:bundle.id\}.log
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.filePattern =
> > >> ${karaf.data}/log/bundle-\$\\\{ctx:bundle.id\}.log.%i
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.append = true
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.layout.type =
> > >
> > >PatternLayout
> > >
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.layout.pattern =
> > >> ${log4j2.pattern}
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.policies.type =
> > >
> > >Policies
> > >
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.policies.size.type =
> > >> SizeBasedTriggeringPolicy
> > >> log4j2.appender.routing.routes.bundle.appender.policies.size.size =
> > >
> > >8MB
> > >
> > >Thanks, Guillaume. Can you add this appender configuration to Karaf
> > >4.1?
> > >
> > >O.
> > >
> > >> 2017-01-17 23:31 GMT+01:00 mbelling <mbe...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > I am also interested in the sift/MDC configuration in Karaf 4.1.
> > >
> > >Was
> > >
> > >> > there
> > >> > any more progress on this?
