+1 on faster release cycles. I was quite ok with the slow paced Karaf release cycle in the past, i could imagine that, if you go faster (speaking of maybe even 4-6 weeks) it would make sense to have smaller logical units.
Will share some more thoughts on this in a separate post. /Toni *www.rebaze.de <http://www.rebaze.de/> | www.rebaze.com <http://www.rebaze.com/> | @rebazeio <https://twitter.com/rebazeio>* On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > Good idea for smaller but faster releases. > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > czw., 16 sie 2018 o 06:38 Francois Papon <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > Hi, > > > > +1 for both :) > > > > Releasing every 2 month make the release smallest and I think it's good > > for our users, it make the upgrade of their project or runtime easier. > > > > regards, > > > > François Papon > > [email protected] > > > > On 16/08/2018 08:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > as I don't want to hold 4.2.1 any longer, I will merge the last PRs > > > today and I will submit 4.2.1 to vote tonight/tomorrow early morning. > > > > > > If required I will cut a 4.2.2 pretty soon. > > > > > > I would like to propose a regular pace in our release, something like > at > > > least (it's a minimum) a release every 2 month "as it is". > > > > > > It would be easier for our user to get the changes "on the fly". > > > > > > I would like to apply this for Karaf "container" but also for the > > > subprojects (Decanter, Cellar, Cave, ...). > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > >
