Hello OK - I'll send ops4j announcement soon, but tl;dr version here.
I've released: - pax-transx 0.4.2 - pax-jms 1.0.3 - pax-jdbc 1.3.2 - pax-cdi 1.1.0 - pax-web 7.2.7 All releases use same versions of some important bundles (e.g., xbean 4.12). pax-cdi is upgraded to latest weld2 and owb1. Also check http://people.apache.org/~ggrzybek/bundle-report-full-karaf.xml report - it's perfectly aligned, not including hibernate features (which we use directly from upstream hibernate projects) - but nothing that can't be tweaked using etc/org.apache.karaf.features.xml. I'm doing last tests with KARAF-6074 "Race condition between the FeaturesService and FeatureDeploymentListener" and my work is done here. @Benjamin Graf - I remember about your suggestion for consistency report, but I wasn't able to check it this week - it was very busy week for me. best regards Grzegorz Grzybek wt., 15 sty 2019 o 18:35 Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Hello > > Looks like it's going to be kind of "release train" :) > > I've prepared local versions of: > - pax-transx > - pax-jms > - pax-jdbc > - pax-cdi > - pax-web > - karaf itself > > I aligned the differences, so there's now 24 "duplicates" instead of 47. > Out of these 21, 17 are spring duplicates (simply because Karaf uses 5.0 > and 5.1). and remaining ones are quite irrelevant (JPA 2.1 + 2.2 for > example in openjpa and openjpa3 features). > > I could successfully use xbean 4.12 across pax-cdi, pax-web and karaf > (using xbean-asm7-shaded) - all pax-cdi and pax-web tests pass. > commons-codec 1.11 is included (single version of this library across all > the above projects) > > about pax-cdi - that's interesting - I could successfully clear some > problems, use latest weld and openwebbeans (CDI 1.2) and use xbean 4.12 > > Tomorrow I'm going to release all 5 above pax-* projects. > > best regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > pon., 14 sty 2019 o 15:52 Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > >> Hello >> >> So far so good. I used single xbean in pax-cdi 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT (probably >> I'll end up with 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT) - xbean 4.12 (with xbean-asm7-shaded). >> >> Karaf tests work fine and we can have single set of xbean-* artifacts. >> >> regards >> Grzegorz Grzybek >> >> pon., 14 sty 2019 o 13:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> napisał(a): >> >>> OK, go for xbean and commons-codec. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 14/01/2019 13:38, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >>> > Thanks for reporting alignment problems >>> > >>> > Here's the report: >>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggrzybek/bundle-report-full-karaf.xml (see >>> my >>> > previous emails about how to generate it[1]). >>> > >>> > Somehow pax-web 7.2.6 can't get into Maven Central. But as you pointed >>> out, >>> > I think it's worth doing next pax-cdi release too (version alignment >>> only). >>> > >>> > JB - please leave xbean and commons-codec to me - I'll have them >>> aligned ok? >>> > >>> > regards >>> > Grzegorz Grzybek >>> > === >>> > [1]: >>> > >>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Version-alignment-report-for-Karaf-4-2-3-SNAPSHOT-1-2-td4054786.html >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > pon., 14 sty 2019 o 13:34 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> napisał(a): >>> > >>> >> Hi Robert, >>> >> >>> >> already done on a local branch. I'm creating the corresponding Jira. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Regards >>> >> JB >>> >> >>> >> On 14/01/2019 13:26, Robert Varga wrote: >>> >>> On 14/01/2019 13:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>>> Good point. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Greg or I will tackle this. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> while you are looking at this, would it make sense to align >>> >>> commons-codec at upgraded 1.11 release? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>
