Child instances have dedicated port number, so it's not a problem. Regards JB
On 20/11/2019 07:52, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > IMO, alias would be better. But how about child containers? > (instance:create)? > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > śr., 20 lis 2019 o 07:50 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm working on adding JMXMP connector on Karaf JMX layer (in addition of >> the RMI connector we already have). >> >> I was thinking about the default JMX context we are using. >> >> Right now, our context contains the Karaf instance name. For users, it >> means they have to use service URL like >> service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/karaf-foo >> >> It's not very convenient/predictable: for instance, in jconsole, the >> users have to use the full service URL. >> Of course, they can change the URL to use /jmxrmi in >> etc/org.apache.karaf.management.cfg but it's not the default. >> >> I propose to either: >> 1. Use /jmxrmi context instead of /karaf-${karaf.name} >> 2. Keep the default /karaf-${karaf.name} context and add an "alias" on >> /jmxrmi >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
