Hmm, it is required by spec (104.12.1 of
https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/service.cm.html) and used by
consumers like osgi-cdi since it is in the API through
@RequireConfigurationAdmin.
So not sure there is a choice to support it on karaf side.

wdyt?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le dim. 12 janv. 2020 à 20:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a
écrit :

> It depends of the requirements. As usage, the package capability is
> mostly enough. That's why it was not required.
>
> However, it makes sense for extend.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 12/01/2020 18:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is it normal master staticcm module does not exposes osgi.implementation?
> > ([1])
> > It breaks its usage in several frameworks on top of it.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/pull/25
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to