I guess we could lift version, other projects (ie. ActiveMQ) aim jakarta
in next major version. For them its more of the JMS API change, for us
its more of other dependencies.
However, it is not entirely clear to me how the osgi specs will go,
cause we have there some to follow. I know pax stuff is going to
deliver, its just a question of "compatibility".
I wouldn't hold a breath on spec alignment, but having some clear guide
of how 5.0 will work with new/old stuff can help us evangelizing
community about possible troubles or further work ahead of them.
Cheers,
Łukasz
On 21.09.2023 19:52, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
Hi JB-
For Jakarta-based Karaf, should we go ahead and call it Karaf 5.0.0?
-Matt
On Sep 21, 2023, at 10:45 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi guys,
now that we released Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.4 and 4.3.10:
- I updated main branch to use 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT branch
- I created karaf-4.4.x branch
As a reminder, karaf-4.3.x will move "not active" when the first 4.5.0
version will be released.
Regards
JB
