Hello I'll try to comment in general topic a bit later, but for now, one inline response (below):
niedz., 9 cze 2024 o 20:45 Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > I think this summarizes a core maintenance issue with pax+karaf today > > > I am not sure how many people travel between PAX and Karaf and vice > versa, but lets be honest - contribution criteria for PAX is lower than for > Karaf. > > I suggest we take a look at migrating pax-* (pax-logging. pax-url, > pax-web, etc) into karaf for a couple of practical benefits (perhaps for > Karaf 4.5?): > We had such discussion in 2022: https://lists.apache.org/thread/7oc4opjbplxps9gt8jnr5lxlmtwx0lzh Some time ago, I've moved OPS4J Jira issues to GitHub and I think it improved the release process and community feedback greatly (much easier to create issues and link them with commits). I don't want to sound like an "owner" of Pax Web or Pax Logging, because I only maintain great projects standing on the shoulders of giants. > > 1. Less repositories to manage and preform releases > 2. Artifacts (jars, configs, services) are less confusing to users (ie. > org.apache.karaf.web makes more sense vs org.ops4j.pax.web .. etc) > > This would also give us an opportunity to see how this gels before > finalizing what is supported in Karaf 5 (jetty, tomcat, etc). > Pax Web and Pax Logging would be direct "competitor" to Felix Web and Felix Log and I'm not sure it's good for ASF... But I'm just a plain and simple code maintainer ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Thoughts? > > Matt Pavlovich
