Thanks Daniel, that's a lot clearer now. 

On 2018/09/11 18:05:11, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: 
> On 09/11/2018 08:03 PM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> > Hi Daniel
> > 
> > Thanks for the response. I've included some comments inline.
> > 
> > On 2018/09/11 10:40:46, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2018 12:23 PM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> >>> Hi All
> >>>
> >>> On the mood analysis screen  https://s.apache.org/YImU
> >>>
> >>> I’ve noticed the toggle on the mood analysis so would like to know 
> >>> exactly what this means.
> >>>
> >>> Also if you click the box to toggle between the two modes then it’s not 
> >>> clear from the screen when you are using ‘Relative’ mode and when you are 
> >>> using ‘Comparative’ mode.
> >>
> >> The text in the charts change when you tick the box, and should explain
> >> what it is.
> > 
> > Ah.. I see that now but am glad to hear the elaboration as it wasn't clear 
> > to me.
> > 
> >   If that's not clear enough, let me elaborate:
> >>
> >> Standard (unticked) mode
> > 
> > So does standard mode = relative mode?
> 
> "relative/comparative" is *one* mode, it's either off or on :)
> two words for the same mode.
> 
> If enabled, it compares moods to *all* lists it has, regardless of 
> filtering.
> If off, it only shows how that list (or those lists) are.
> 
> > 
> > shows the moods as an 'absolute' value
> >> unrelated to the average across lists. Moods are still relative to each
> >> other (in that the median is close to 100), but they only reflect the
> >> list(s) you have chosen to analyze.
> > 
> > Ok so to me this means that the relative mode shows the mood analysis say 
> > across one project if that is the filter being used. So with my Httpd 
> > example - in relative mode this gives me an indicator of the general mood 
> > profile for Httpd based on and in relation to the other moods that the 
> > Httpd project generates.
> > 
> > And the mood gauge in relative mode gives me an overall indication of the 
> > filtered project or view (e.g Httpd) based on the moods found in the 
> > sources for the filter. So the more positive the moods found, the higher 
> > the rating will be.
> > 
> > If my understanding is wrong then please correct me as I really need to get 
> > this as it is going to be part of my research :-)
> > 
> >>
> >> Relative mode (ticked)
> > 
> > Should this be Comparative mode?
> > 
> > uses the same values, but compares them to the
> >> overall moods found in *all* lists in the database.
> > 
> > So does this mean that you are comparing against all the sources for the 
> > organisation or if you have multiple organisations will it compare against 
> > all organisations?
> > 
> >  From what you say, it sounds like comparative mode (if that is what it is) 
> > compares the mood profile against everything. So Kibbletest will compare 
> > Httpd's mood profile against all the other projects loaded into Kibbletest.
> > 
> > 
> > Thus, on the right
> >> side, a score of 50% or above means you are doing as well or better than
> >> other lists in terms of happy moods, and a score lower than that would
> >> mean the list(s) don't quite reflect the overall mood of all lists. On
> >> the left side, the values are relative to overall mood as well, in that
> >> 100 means 'same as all the other lists', anything higher means a more
> >> prevalent occurrence on the list(s) you picked, whereas a value lower
> >> than 100 means it's less frequent there compared to the overall average.
> >>
> > 
> > OK this is good and this is clearer
> > 
> > So now I'm after more :-) Is there a way to compare the mood profiles of 
> > two different projects. For example, if I wanted to compare the profiles of 
> > Httpd and Beam, how could I do that?
> > 
> >> I hope that helps, and if we need to work on the UI explanations, maybe
> >> add a document to the documentation, then so be it :)
> > 
> > It does - thanks. I'd probably be happier with clearer explanations so will 
> > document what I can as I'm going through.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
> > 
> >>
> >> With regards,
> >> Daniel.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Sharan
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 

Reply via email to