Thanks Kaxil and Fourat.

I hope we will be able to start working on a new Kibble soon!

T.

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 23:21, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Added my comments to the doc too.
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:07 PM Fourat ZOUARI <fou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tomek, Sharan, Added some suggests to the doc
> >
> > Thx, Fourat
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:53 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Sharan!
> > >
> > > I already prepared the project structure together with some automation
> > > (pre-commits, CI, etc) on my fork:
> > > https://github.com/turbaszek/kibble
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Tomek
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:57, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Tomek
> > > >
> > > > Great initiative! I will take a look.
> > > >
> > > > I am still waiting on feedback from infra regarding the repo rename so
> > > will follow up on that  again today as it would be good to get started
> > with
> > > the new version.
> > > >
> > > > And yes - interesting to see popularity increasing :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Sharan
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/02/20 08:11:10, Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
> > > > > https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
> > > > > confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
> > > > > to cwiki.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the crucial point (not covered in doc) is to decide if we
> > want
> > > > > to reuse the existing Kibble database or not. In my opinion, breaking
> > > > > backward compatibility may improve development speed.
> > > > >
> > > > > And as an interesting fact I think Kibble is getting interestingly
> > > "popular":
> > > > > https://imgur.com/JssRETL
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Tomek
> > > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to