Hi Marek, Just to confirm, drools 7.x, 7.67.x, 7.67.x-blue would be the same? Should we raise backport PRs for products to kiegroup/drools instead of apache/incubator-kie-drools?
Regards, Toshiya On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:16 PM Marek Novotny <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes that is correct, Roberto. > > The migration team agreed to not take into community any forward > backporting for non-community things, but because the transferring of > repositories can't do anything about that there could be some branches > which are there just for read-only history as fact of transfer. > > BR, > > Dne 9/26/23 v 18:18 Roberto Oliveira napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > Regarding the migration of the repositories to Apache, I would like to > > confirm if my understanding is correct for some repositories that we > > are using for the RHPAM/Kogito product and have migrated to Apache. > > > > For example, in the Kogito-images repository (migrated to [1]) we are > > still using legacy branches like 1.13.x and 1.13.x-blue for building > > RHPAM 7.13.x and BAMOE 8.0.x. So IIUC, we are keeping the fork/mirror > > on kiegroup [2] so we can do the product builds from that repository > > (also to avoid problems in productization tools with the new > > repositories names) > > > > Said that, PRs like [3] would have to be opened in Kiegroup (as it > > targets branch 1.13.x-next branch) instead of Apache. Is my > > understanding correct? > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images/ > > [2] https://github.com/kiegroup/kogito-images > > [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images/pull/1683 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > -- > Marek Novotny > -- > > RedHat JBoss Middleware > > Red Hat Czech s.r.o. > Purkynova 111 > 612 45 Brno > >
