Hi Walter,
Thanks for creating this thread!
+1 for discussing issue 1739 after the Apache KIE 10 release.
I think the topic of moving `kn-plugin-workflow` and the
`kogito-swf-{devmode,builder}` images to the operator repo is a
separate conversation that still requires further discussion. We can
do so using Zanini's thread about it, if you think that's ok
(https://lists.apache.org/thread/lkgql67ks9q2gpkgc8x8d0hn91fzrncl)
Regards,
Tiago Bento
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:37 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would argue that making any more changes beyond the ongoing work for
> fixing the circular deps in kie-tools for the next release should be
> moved afterwards; otherwise this will never happen.
> As far as my concern goes it is ok as this is fulfilled.
> Regarding the discussion itself, this is the first time I saw this in
> the mailing list (official channel); So I would say to create a HEADS
> UP or proper PROPOSAL dependending on the size
> or the scope of this would be nice for giving the chance to everyone
> to get involved in the discussion and clarify what, when and the risk
> involved.
>
> El lun, 29 abr 2024 a las 16:09, Mark Proctor (<[email protected]>)
> escribió:
> >
> > Does this work for other people too? Any concerns?
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 12:25, Walter Medvedeo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello team,
> > >
> > > Regarding the topic discussed in Friday's meeting, about a potential
> > > circular dependency kn-plugin-workflow -> kogito-swf-builder -> operator
> > > ->
> > > kn-plugin-workflow introduced by:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images/issues/1739, I think
> > > the concern is valid, however, I believe we should consider this:
> > >
> > > 1) After release 10 we have programmed work (already discussed) for
> > > refactoring code from kie-tools back to the operator repository, which
> > > includes the kn-plugin-workflow, etc.
> > >
> > > 2) https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images/issues/1739 is a
> > > kind of "feature" request, that AFAIK is not a compromise for release 10
> > >
> > > So, in my opinion, we shouldn't block the release 10 because of
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-images/issues/1739.
> > > Instead,
> > > this should be tackled as part of 1).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Walter.
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
