I think it is worth circling back after our release to this topic, thank you for brining it up, Chris!
Also, +1 from me. On 2024/05/22 08:46:40 Christofer Dutz wrote: > +1 > > Most Apache project that I’m involved in use GitHub actions for testing the > PRs and only use Jenkins for deploying of Snapshots and running tests that > GitHub doesn’t allow us to run. > > Chris > > > Von: Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <[email protected]> > Datum: Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2024 um 10:34 > An: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Abandon PR checks in Jenkins > Hi Jan, > > What is the impact for the projects ? One of my concerns is related to > test outcome publications. Right now github actions are a bit > cumbersome. > Can you elaborate a bit regarding the impact ? > > El mié, 22 may 2024 a las 10:00, Jan Šťastný (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > > Hello, > > > > Due to our technical debt in Jenkins PR checks and repeated problems with > > execution times and long waiting queues, I'd like to propose dropping > > Jenkins PR checks for repositories where we have an equivalent alternative > > in GHA PR checks. > > > > That applies most probably to: > > - incubator-kie-drools > > - incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes > > - incubator-kie-kogito-apps > > - incubator-kie-kogito-examples > > - incubator-kie-optaplanner > > - incubator-kie-optaplanner-quickstarts > > > > The assumption is to do a cross-check for each repository whether the scope > > of PR checks is equivalent, but generally I am positive GHA actions are > > already superior in terms of flexibility and scope. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Regards > > Jan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
