Hi Thiago,

I'll take a look at kn-plugin-workflow:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/tree/main/packages/kn-plugin-workflow
for 10.0.
I had a chat with Jakub Schwan and he should be taking care of the
operator.

Do you have an issue reported for the e2e tests that were simply not
working? I was not aware of that at all, so any details are appreciated.

Thanks!

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 17:30, Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you for clarifying, Fabrizio!
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 12:24 PM Fabrizio Antonangeli <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not in my opinion as sonataflow-operator is a new kie-tools package and
> > the bug is only for local developments.
> >
> > On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 12:16 -0300, Alex Porcelli wrote:
> > > Is this something that blocks the release?
> > >
> > > There’s another thread [1] in ML already planning the release branch…
> > >
> > > [1] -
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/g164c2z9y82l3bprmpn132zdwjk2nds8
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 3:16 PM Fabrizio Antonangeli <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Thiago,
> > > >
> > > > Just for information, regarding the sonataflow-operator package on
> > > > kie-tools, I am working on [1]. I am short of knowledge of this
> > > > particular
> > > > tech-stack but I'm trying my best to fix this issue asap.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/issues/2461
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 12:49 AM Thiago Lugli
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Following the discussion regarding circular dependencies on
> > > > > Apache KIE,
> > > > > we’ve migrated most of the Sonataflow packages to kie-tools
> > > > > (kogito-swf-builder image – renamed to sonataflow-builder-image,
> > > > > kogito-swf-devmode image – renamed to sonataflow-devmode-image,
> > > > > kogito-serverless-operator – renamed sonataflow-operator) [1].
> > > > > They are currently building successfully on the kie-tools CI, but
> > > > > for the
> > > > > sonataflow-operator package we have never actually been able to
> > > > > test if
> > > > > it’s working correctly, either because there was an unreleased
> > > > > dependency
> > > > > (e.g. some snapshot build or image) at the time or simply because
> > > > > the e2e
> > > > > tests were not working on the original kogito-serverless-operator
> > > > > repository [2] and I lacked the proper knowledge to fix them.
> > > > >
> > > > > My question is: Given that the sonataflow-operator and its
> > > > > dependencies
> > > > > are part of the Apache KIE 10 release, and considering that the
> > > > > kogito-serverless-operator repository is not listed as part of
> > > > > the
> > > > release
> > > > > procedure [3], can we ensure that they are functioning as
> > > > > expected on
> > > > > kie-tools?
> > > > >
> > > > > The same question is valid for the kn-plugin-workflow, since it
> > > > > directly
> > > > > depends on the sonataflow-operator.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] Packages on kie-tools:
> > > > >
> > > > >   *   sonataflow-operator:
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/tree/main/packages/sonataflow-operator
> > > > >   *   kn-plugin-workflow:
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/tree/main/packages/kn-plugin-workflow
> > > > >   *   sonataflow-builder-image:
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/tree/main/packages/sonataflow-builder-image
> > > > >   *   sonataflow-devmode-image:
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-tools/tree/main/packages/sonataflow-devmode-image
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [2] kogito-serverless-operator repo:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-serverless-operator
> > > > > [3] Apache KIE 10 :: Release Procedure:
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t-08b970i9PMBy-TSM64x0RUH46pzwnIhEi-LVeL0lg/edit#heading=h.69qvogh2xqsq
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to