Thank you all for voting. I'm closing this thread now and will announce the results within a few minutes.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:39 AM Dominik Hanak <[email protected]> wrote: > > -0.7 > > > I suggest we first release 10.1.0 and finish the proposal[1] then build on > top of it based on what we learned. > > While a step in right direction, I do not see much benefits in current > state, the proposal suggests we move from 4-repo ( drools, runtimes, apps, > kie-tools ) > to 2-repo (kie -> kie-extras), but it seems like a squash of code without > any benefits. Workflows in GHActions still need to be maintained and > release procedure jobs too. The complexity removed in build-chain seems to > be moving to maven modules. We'll know once we execute. I guess. > > We should aim for the ability to run tests on pull-requests that depend on > each other in the 2-repo setup as we aimed to do it 4-repo. > Thanks to `build-chain` this is currently done across drools, runtimes, > apps but not all the way to kie-tools because of the weekly-snapshot > mechanism. > Imho that should be a top priority and from my perspective a proposal that > does such a huge change should bring this in as a benefit by default. > For example, a weekly update is created on `kie-extras` and we see blockers > that prevent the update from being merged for 3+ days. > In the meantime a regular progress with `kie` development. That means `kie` > is 3 days ahead of `kie-extras`. There could be extreme situations, > where the update is not merged in weeks and kie-extras has a huge gap of > changes to consume. Does not sound right, that a main branch can get so > outdated on one end. > What will happen in those cases? Is there some policy to handle this > situation? Could you please elaborate on this issue? > > The SNAPSHOT's part around kie-extras is not clear at all. Would be nice to > add some details. > The rules in the link you provided, seem clear and can be easily met by our > community. > > > Lastly, could you please update the proposal to follow [3]? > > Thanks, > > Dominik > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/drojdtvz6xx1zo35ggjm75xdngnfcl21 > [2] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/?tab=readme-ov-file#kogito-pipelines > [3] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=340037098#Guidelinefordiscussion,proposalandvote-ProposalTemplate --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
