+ 1 to that!

On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 09:54, Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you for this initiative, Enrique!
>
> +1, big time!
>
> -
> Alex
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 2:29 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Most of you are aware that the configuration supported by the project
> > (the compact architecture) only is supported by quarkus and not SB.
> > This might impact the project adoption in one of the most used
> > microservice frameworks (or standard de facto) for building
> > microservice.
> >
> > The one thing stopping us from supporting this runtime in compact
> > architecture is these components that require some attention.
> >
> > We already have patterns on how to deal with this sort of problem.
> > (multiple runtime support), so ideally is to use them to upgrade these
> > components to use those and add support for the runtime. Basically
> > would be
> >
> > 1. identify the common components and isolate properly without any
> runtime
> > use.
> > 2. minimize the codebase deployed in runtime (should be a thin layer)
> > 3. Move the generic tests to the common components and integration
> > test to the runtimes components)
> > 4. remove all features that are not shared among runtimes or they are
> > incompatible among runtimes to avoid code duplication and therefore
> > reduce the sustaining effort.
> >
> > Let me know your thoughts.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to