Hi Sandeep - That is a good point....
While 0.10.0 is feature bearing, we may be able to defer more of the outstanding tasks to an 0.10.1 or 0.11.0 and keep 0.10.0 as close to bug fixes as possible. I will have a look at the changes that have already made it in and see if we can make that make sense. thanks, --larry On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sandeep More <moresand...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Larry, > > I think that's a good idea the only thing is we are closer to cutting 0.10 > release. > If 0.10 is not drastically different than 0.9.X one might just jump to 0.10 > than going to 0.9.2, I think. > > Best, > Sandeep > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:48 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > All - > > > > There have been a number of bug fixes on the 0.9.0 branch in the event > that > > we may need to cut an 0.9.2 release for a serious enough issue. > > > > Off the top of my head, I know that we have LDAP response paging, > Location > > header encoding and just now I had to downgrade httpclient to 4.5.1 to > fix > > an issue with SPNEGO+SSL. > > > > Since 0.9.1 will not work for secure clusters with SSL enabled, I believe > > that it warrants an 0.9.2 release. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > thanks. > > > > --larry > > >
