[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16044506#comment-16044506
]
Larry McCay commented on KNOX-788:
----------------------------------
[~nixonrodrigues] - I am sorry for not being more clear earlier. The general
approach for proxying UIs that have their own authentication mechanisms is to
actually for the use of the Anonymous authentication provider for the UI. My
earlier comments were really about your API patch where we may want to leverage
authentication mechanisms from the gateway at some point.
I think that we need to consider leaving the policy provider declarations in
the service definition for the Atlas UI and remove them from the API definition.
Does that make sense?
> Apache Atlas Admin UI Support through Knox
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KNOX-788
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-788
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Jeffrey E Rodriguez
> Assignee: Chandana Mirashi
> Fix For: 0.13.0
>
> Attachments: KNOX-788.1.patch, KNOX-788.patch
>
>
> Apache Atlas Admin UI Support through Knox.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
