[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Phil Zampino updated KNOX-1133:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
There are multiple ZooKeeper-based URLManager implementations:
* BaseZookeeperURLManager extensions
** KafkaZooKeeperURLManager
** HBaseZooKeeperURLManager
** SOLRZooKeeperURLManager
* HS2ZooKeeperURLManager

These should all be updated to employ clients from the remote configuration 
registry client service.

Either a single well-known client name can be relied upon by all of these 
implementations, or there could be a configuration property for each 
implementation, binding it to a ZooKeeper client.

Careful consideration should be given to the backward-compatibility 
requirements around continued support for the current configuration model.



  was:
There are multiple ZooKeeper-based URLManager implementations:
* BaseZookeeperURLManager extensions
** KafkaZooKeeperURLManager
** HBaseZooKeeperURLManager
** SOLRZooKeeperURLManager
* HS2ZooKeeperURLManager

These should all be updated to employ clients from the remote configuration 
registry client service.

Careful consideration should be given to the backward-compatibility 
requirements around continued support for the current configuration model.




> Update ZooKeeper URLManager implementations to use registry client service 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KNOX-1133
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1133
>             Project: Apache Knox
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Server
>    Affects Versions: 0.14.0
>            Reporter: Phil Zampino
>             Fix For: 0.15.0
>
>
> There are multiple ZooKeeper-based URLManager implementations:
> * BaseZookeeperURLManager extensions
> ** KafkaZooKeeperURLManager
> ** HBaseZooKeeperURLManager
> ** SOLRZooKeeperURLManager
> * HS2ZooKeeperURLManager
> These should all be updated to employ clients from the remote configuration 
> registry client service.
> Either a single well-known client name can be relied upon by all of these 
> implementations, or there could be a configuration property for each 
> implementation, binding it to a ZooKeeper client.
> Careful consideration should be given to the backward-compatibility 
> requirements around continued support for the current configuration model.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to