Thanks, Sandeep and Phil!

I have verified the double configuration param issue and have a patch ready
to go.
I will cancel this VOTE and spin a new RC with the fix.


On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org> wrote:

> -1
>
> I've discovered that conf/gateway-site.xml defines the
> gateway.dispatch.whitelist property twice, each with different values.
> This may result in the expected behavior, but it's technically incorrect
> (properties should not be defined twice) and it's certainly confusing.
>
> Less concerning is that the CHANGES file does not include any changes from
> rc1 --> rc2.
>
> * Verified GPG/MD5/SHA signatures for Knox source, Knox and KnoxShell
> release
> packages (zip files)
> * Downloaded and built from source (with Java 1.8.0_144)
> * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
> * Checked ISSUES file
> * Checked CHANGES file
> * Ran KnoxShell samples
> * Exercised the Admin UI (provider configuration wizard, descriptor wizard,
> etc...)
> * Verified the Admin UI issues discovered in RC1 (URL field validation,
> topology list refreshing) have been addressed
> * Tested service discovery and topology generation
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:21 PM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All -
> >
> > A number of issues were identified and subsequently fixed based
> > on testing of RC 1.
> >
> > Release candidate #2 for the Apache Knox 1.1.0 is available at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-1.1.0/
> >
> > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
> > Branch v1.1.0 (git checkout -b v1.1.0)
> > Tag is v1.1.0-rc2
> >
> > The KEYS file for signature validation is available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 1.1.0.
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 1.1.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --larry
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to